superstudmuffin Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 Not likely Nightmare, reading some of Mockings comments from the past in recently updated topics as result of of this thread only highlight his or hers negativity and disrespect for members who actually contribute something worthwhile to this site.
Guest Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 I think you should mention that it's kind of sarcasm because I and a few others in the post obviously took it the wrong way, sarcasm doesn't work well on the internet!
Chopper Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 This site is not designed for members to have their work disparaged. That's always been the case. There were no complaints about this thread, if there had been it may have been handled differently. If you are going to post satire or sarcasm Mocking, please be clear. Especially in a detailed and well written thread. Otherwise the staff can only assume it's a clever way to disguise taking digs at people in a round about way. Which wouldn't be acceptable.
Stop Mocking Me0 Posted January 7, 2015 Author Posted January 7, 2015 Not likely Nightmare, reading some of Mockings comments from the past in recently updated topics as result of of this thread only highlight his or hers negativity and disrespect for members who actually contribute something worthwhile to this site. His, and the Irony in this is I actually didn't mean to call out anyone, but I find this quote quite offensive as it is negative and shows disrespect for someone trying to contribute to the site.
Tattoo247 Posted January 18, 2015 Posted January 18, 2015 I was once in the meth business. It was awful. What!? lol
xACE_OF_AWSOMx Posted February 5, 2015 Posted February 5, 2015 Ahh.... I like it when Stop Mocking Me0 blows my mind with all these theories........
xACE_OF_AWSOMx Posted February 5, 2015 Posted February 5, 2015 Ahh.... I like it when Stop Mocking Me0 blows my mind with all these theories........
Guest Posted February 5, 2015 Posted February 5, 2015 Why did you repost that same message hours later?
Tattoo247 Posted February 5, 2015 Posted February 5, 2015 Why did you repost that same message hours later? Alternate timelines, obviously
malz_moser22 Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 Over the last series of months, there have been multiple concepts that have lead to unagreeable argument because of lack of information, I'm not going to point fingers at who is responsible for such ill-kept rumors... OF course this would point to playing as children, and no game in their right mind would depict children shooting zombies. If Walking Dead can do it on National Television. Treyarch should have no problems.
Stop Mocking Me0 Posted March 2, 2015 Author Posted March 2, 2015 Over the last series of months, there have been multiple concepts that have lead to unagreeable argument because of lack of information, I'm not going to point fingers at who is responsible for such ill-kept rumors... OF course this would point to playing as children, and no game in their right mind would depict children shooting zombies. If Walking Dead can do it on National Television. Treyarch should have no problems. There are rules about this, you can't just have a game where it's possible to just KILL children en mass.
Guest Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 I used to always say children were a no go in a zombie maps for the obvious reasons. But I think that there must be a way around it at some point in the future, not that it matters either way a zombie is a zombie to me.
malz_moser22 Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 (edited) I didn't think it was killing children en mass? I thought you were saying Samantha and Richtofen were children and that means they are human killing zombies?? Or did I miss something? Edited March 2, 2015 by malz_moser22
Stop Mocking Me0 Posted March 2, 2015 Author Posted March 2, 2015 I'm sorry the last time I had this conversation was over a year ago, and it took place at a school. Children zombies= No go. But as I was saying, do you really want to play as Samantha or Eddy in their pajamas shooting zombies? That's even more unrealistic than buried...
Administrators InfestLithium Posted March 2, 2015 Administrators Posted March 2, 2015 I didn't think it was killing children en mass? I thought you were saying Samantha and Richtofen were children and that means they are human killing zombies?? Or did I miss something? Killing one child non-explicitly like Walking Dead did was a great move for a pilot episode, because it showed that WD could get away with it to a degree. But to have that in a Zombies game would only be bad for publicity purposes. Think about all those raging non-gamers! And yeah, as Mocking said, killing zombies as children just doesn't sound all too exciting, especially since it's just two normal, little kids that aren't expected to curse or make degrading comments that we've come to love.
Stop Mocking Me0 Posted March 2, 2015 Author Posted March 2, 2015 Plus, if you ever beat the moon easter egg, playing as a little child gets old QUICK!
Black Hand Smith Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 Zombie children have happened before usually in older movies when killing kids wasn't as taboo as it is today. In fact alot of things in older movies will probably not be allowed today. Dawn of the Dead. George Romero
Guest Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 I don't like playing as Sam, having a little girl in a guys body is funny for the map but to me has no place in a whole chapter of zombies which is one of the reasons why I think they took the characters in a new direction in Black Ops 2 by not having them.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now