Tac

The similarities of these two images are just... man. I can't wait. Good find!

Awesome thread, never knew this existed. Just saved my life right now!

Brazil is always possible but I consider it way to obvious, for one. For two, Dempsey says they already went there, and I don't see any maps of us going backwards, especially when the time he was at Brazil was likely during Richtofen's two year absence, meaning we'd play with the Origins 3 and a random, instead of the Origins 4.

Is there any way you can format this in a way that better fits the whole page, instead of the single column from the status update reply box that you copy and pasted from? After that, evidence to support your claims would add legitimacy to your post. I'd recommend making this into a full post with all the details, so others can see your thoughts!

Lolol what in the hell did I just watch...

Se7enSins forum has a post with the current known steps (though no finale) and on Reddit, one user says they have done and confirmed what's been listed thus far, while another originally claimed they had but since said maybe not, and YouTuber "The Resort" states he can't recreate it.

@Nightmare Voyager, to me, the Origins 3 seem to have tabs on either the many old Richtofen's or the singular young Richtofen, as those two interact in various timelines. I say he must be keeping tabs because when young Richtofen kills old Richtofen, Dempsey says "I thought we were done with this!" Now, I say that tabs are being kept on the many old Richtofen's, instead of the singular young Richtofen, because Dempsey asked young Richtofen where he'd been for two years (pointing to no tabs on young Richtofen), and Nikolai mentions killing multiple Richtofen's (possible indication of tab on many old Richtofen's). Somehow, they know when something is going to happen to an old Richtofen and in The Giant, it is the first time in two years that they have known something was going to happen. Does that seem plausible?

The reason I don't see the connection is because I consider the Moon orb to be specific to that timeline and only work in that timeline, whereas the Apothicon Rift Stone isn't specific to any timeline and actually works in the entire Universe. I see them as having fundamentally different purposes, so I don't think they can be described as the same thing but in different timelines. Also, I can see where you're coming from with that. Certainly a possible theory.

First and foremost, after spending the 30 seconds thinking about it and reading these replies, instead of thinking I had a clear understanding, I absolutely concede that I'm wrong. No possible way for Giant and Origins to be the same timeline. I want to point out, however, that neither of these two things proves it. The personalities can be explained by saying that even if Origins and The Giant were the same timeline, it begins converging with the original timeline and becomes altered. I had thought of that, but reasoned it away as simply them making repairs on a very old one. This is a fantastic point, and frankly, one that I had never thought of (somehow). Bravo. @Stop Mocking Me0, that's vertainly an interesting theory haha. I don't believe the Apothicon Rift Stone is connected to the ball on Moon just yet, nor that the Moon EE really counts as "sacrifices" in the same sense, but who knows. By "wraith-like vrill guardians," are you referring to the Keepers? Your use of terms is confusing me, a little.

Not his footage, it originates from Reddit. Since my post was the last of page 4, I'll quote it here:

For anyone who cares, this originates from a Reddit post with the title "d_str_yth_st_t__s," and as one can notice, it appears the vowels are removed. As others have pointed out on Reddit, it could mean destroy the statues. Just thought I'd throw that in there.

It would be nice for situations in which, as opposed to only wanting a perk power-up, you want the chance at one of many things, including a perk bottle.

I genuinely believe it to be nothing. I personally don't think it's at all intentional, but if it is, it's inconsequential. I do hope I'm proven wrong, though.

It's about time we had a thread on this! So first and foremost, similar to what @Cheesegrater28 said, The Giant is not a prequel to Der Riese, per se. The Giant and Der Riese take place in two completely separate timelines so for the robot head to be there is not an issue in terms of it not being there in Der Riese. Additionally, because it is two separate timelines, I personally don't believe that Maxis was referring to the robots when he sent that letter to the Reichstag asking for more funding. As for why it's in The Giant almost three decades after Origins, that's a bit different, but I subscribe to the idea that it's merely being repaired, not being built for the first time. This would mean that Origins and The Giant can still be in the same timeline, which I think is significant.

Thanks everyone, I appreciate it!

Is there any chance of you finding that 114 reference? To me, the technology used to build the FIVE teleporters is similar, if not identical, to the Gersh device. From a visual standpoint, they operate in very similar manners. I'll have to find one of my old threads about this. Five takes place between October 16th and November 22nd, 1963, at 3:00 PM. I'll quote my time and locations thread here:

Thanks for leading me here @PINNAZ, much appreciated! So, first, I assume the two Corvus intel pieces are "SP/Corvus Data archive 17/935" and "SP/Corvus Data archive 67/935" and if this is the case, it's due to campaign progression and nothing else. Additionally, here's a link to my thread about this terminal. Reply with anything you'd like to see added :)

Thank you very much, I appreciate it!

In regards to the quote you mentioned, each character has a significant quote for each of the first three rounds in relation to their "mission" or reason for coming to The Giant, so that wasn't specific to whatever actions you may have performed.

Very odd that they removed the Blackstone references.

I've wondered about this quote myself, before. I just came to believe it was a funny quote and nothing more, as much as I don't like to say it. If we can find a way to may it work, however, that would be something. Would you be able to explain your time travel idea a little more, @ChinaRepublic?

We've discussed Goddard before on the site, though I don't remember why... Anywho, it's awesome seeing a reference to real life in the map, being fictional and all! We haven't had any nods to real life yet so that's awesome.

It's very possible, though worth noting that the name on the "Past Due" slip is Livingston, which wasn't someone we were introduced to in terms of Mob of the Dead. We've only heard something similar to that name twice, with the Living Stone Mine in Buried and a Morg City Boxer named Livingstone, both of which are thought to just be references to a Treyarch employee by the same name.

Nice screen grab, I should have done that. Two very clear images.

Just so you're aware, the date for Nuketown isn't listed anywhere explicitly, such as the loading screen. Additionally, it's probably best to stay away from the CoD Wiki for a lot of stuff haha. They're notorious for incorrect information. However, if you want a great thread on the prospect that Moon and Nuketown are in the 1960s, and more discussion in general, check here.