ZombieOfTheDead

Yeah, I agree. If not Elena, then A7X all the way!

Project Nova was in December 1945.... that's not even 6 months after the war ended.

Looked at it wrong, year is in the 1900s. Guess it is just the timer.

Not sure a radio in the mid 1800s makes sense.... interesting none the less.

Because you rarely upgrade on anything. As soon as you get enough points, get your favorite gun and go. It just gets pretty lame after awhile. Feels like you aren't doing as much, unlike zombies. Also, what you mentioned about trains, etc, that is generally solo only. With groups, to me at the least, it seems much more intense. Especially when it comes to maps that you can't camp as well in.

New perk/weapon/enemy are new things, and DO affect gameplay (Ex:George, better WWs, addition of juggernog, etc.). Survival maps are the same in content, maybe not difficulty, but the lack of different content makes it less fun. Airstrikes and hiring NPCs are the only thing I see as additional content, but traps are kind the same as Airstrikes in a way. I could go on and on about how zombies is better.

Bro, all the survival maps play exactly the same, whereas zombie maps have something different in every map. There are also 10 zombie maps plus dead ops. Yes, I think we all understand that a story and characters wouldn't work out here, but the point is, they make the game less interesting. Also, "fanboyish ways". What are you, in preschool? Dude, most of us already KNEW survival wouldn't be as good as zombies, and it really isn't hard to see, in no way are we being fanboys. Survival in NO way is better than zombies. Doesn't mean it isn't fun, we aren't fanboys bro.

I've got another thing: Changing maps in survival doesn't really change much (except for difficulty? I can't remember) As in, new perks etc Unlike Zombies, I don't think they'll change anything with each map pack, could be wrong, but even if there is a change I highly doubt it will be large.

No question about it, fortified house. Also glad the story was updated Been awhile

Bro, watching and playing are two very different things. I suggest at least renting it. It's fun, hasn't changed too much (It is NOT MW2.5, however), but doesn't mean it isn't fun. It isn't really complaining, you're just pointing out why it couldn't ever compete with zombies. besides, everyone on this site knows zombies is better so it isn't any worry. Oh gawd... rusty spoons :shock:

Yep. But really, who thought it could ever compete with zombies? BTW, you're forgetting about 2 things: The lack of characters, and no zombies in it. BTW, this is off topic, but Salad Fingers scares the crap out me :shock:

What we also need is the developers to take their time on the game instead of rushing it out. HINT Activision. Though if they do this, after BO2, I want mah zombies.

You literally pointed out zero evidence as to how Shangri La and Area 51 could be before CotD. I will say it again, time travel doesn't always have to occur when teleporting, and since there wasn't a reason to go back in time either, they likely all occur one after the other.

That would be the worst ending for our characters, no one would like it, I'm pretty sure we can rule that out.

Just so anyone wants to know, the price is $6.99, or at least that's what I saw. I'm excited for it, now I'll actually have something to do in study hall!

Just so anyone wants to know, the price is $6.99, or at least that's what I saw. I'm excited for it, now I'll actually have something to do in study hall!

I think we can confirm it's not over. Not just because moon didn't seem like the end, but because zombies is what many people buy DLC for. Multiplayer maps alone are NOT worth it.

Awesome. Do we know when this is out? Cost isn't an issue, they can just take it.

Awesome. Do we know when this is out? Cost isn't an issue, they can just take it.

Play No Russian on MW2, there is a guy named Lev. Same name, different guy, different game.

I blame the host's connection. That's usually the case....

Ok, I really like MW3, more than I thought I would. Campaign is easily one of the best, Survival is ok, spec ops is still great, and Multiplayer is completely awesome. There is but one thing I do not like about this game, which also applies to MW2. I die WAY more than I should. In Treyarch games and CoD 4 I completely dominate, but these two really annoy me, if I ever make positive it's like 1 or 2 kills above. I don't care about KDR much, but I am not a fan of dying so much.

Agreed with tac, and either way, he's a voice actor. He isn't tied to a company as far as I know, so not much of a betrayal.

Silent when playing, except the last level.