Jump to content

SwarmxofxHate

Member
  • Content count

    38
  • Divinium

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0

About SwarmxofxHate

  • Rank
    Zombie
  • Birthday 04/12/1988
  1. SwarmxofxHate

    Classic Maps put into Map-Pack for Black Ops.

    I had the money to buy the hardened edition, as it wasn't that much more expensive than the regular version, but when I got to Gamestop all they had were regular and prestige. WTF do I need an RC car for? Not a damn thing. I feel like I simply got screwed, because I'm more than willing to give 3arc my money, and I figured they would come out on Playstation Network a couple months after, but still haven't. I also don't understand why people think they shouldn't release them. Come on guys, you've had 6 months of exclusivity, why can't everyone else get a crack at those maps?
  2. SwarmxofxHate

    The True identity of the Thief!

    BEEP BEEP WRONG You're an idiot. Have you LISTENED to the radios in Der Riese? Guess what Guys? The zombies in Nazi Zombies are BASED OF FACTUAL, NAZI EXPERIMENTS The zombies were not made by people being bitten? They died, and WERE REANIMATED Do you know what REANIMATED means, SwarmxofxHate? It means they died first. God you're whiney The concept of 'reanimation' is within Nazi Zombies. Go listen TO ALL THE DER RIESE radios, BEFORE you enter this discussion Honestly, this is the first time you've said something that wasn't in you initial post. The Der Riese radios mention nothing of turning a dead body into a zombie. Also, were did all the other zombies come from if being bitten wasn't a way to be turned? Maxis only had so many test subjects. Fluffy was test subject 6. So how did 5 zombies become 1000's? Being bitten. Anyway, you haven't said anything about my teleporter debunk in an earlier post. How can you be sure that the Pentagon teleporter is even capable of time travel? Honestly though, you seem VERY passionate about Clarke being the Pentagon thief. We are all entitled to our opinions, I just don't share the same one. If you could prove Clarke was in the Illumanati and/or group 935 you would win me over to your side. As it stands I still think we don't know who he is for sure. In closing, do we really have to resort to name calling? That seems very immature. I'm just stating facts so we can ALL reach the truth, I thought that was what the forum was about.
  3. SwarmxofxHate

    The True identity of the Thief!

    Agreed with the last part, but every zombie media shares something if not everything with another piece of zombie media, if they didn't why would they bother to call it zombies? Also, the points, mystery box, etc. is in there because its a game. But to fully answer you question most of us are referencing other zombie media to explain why Anti Earth's theory has some holes in it. You cant deny the fact that Treyarch zombies share some similarities to George A. Romero's. The origin is a meteor and if you shoot there heads off they die. Anyway, we need to get back on subject. Anyone have any theories as to why it says Living Dead in Illumanati writing on the Thiefs strap? I posted my views up on another post, but no one seemed to care everyone is wanting to argue zombie symantics for some reason.
  4. SwarmxofxHate

    The True identity of the Thief!

    Well I understand what you mean now. Being bitten before death is not the ONLY way, just one. In CoD if you go through a teleporter you can become a zombie because of over-exposure to element 115, this is how the first zombies were made. So yeah I agree with Cpt. Stylin on that. We still need to get back on subject because HalfSwiss said that because its one of the flaws in Anti Earth's theory. i.e. Clarke didn't use a teleporter (as far as we know) and he couldn't be zombified after death because his brains are splattered all over Kowloon, and zombies don't eat necrotic flesh. I personally don't believe he is a zombie or Clarke for that matter.
  5. SwarmxofxHate

    The True identity of the Thief!

    Except there's nothing to suggest this in Nazi Zombies. The radio messages in Der Riese explain the zombies came from failed teleportation experiments. Sorry but yes there is something to suggest this. You shoot the head of a zombie off in the game and it dies, it may keep moving for a little bit but if you watch it, it will walk a little ways and die without you needing to do anymore damage.
  6. SwarmxofxHate

    The True identity of the Thief!

    I'm not sure if this was posted somewhere else in a different thread, but I decrypted the Illumanati writing on the Thief's strap and it says "Living Dead". I'm not sure what this means, and honestly I think it just opens more doors for questions because the Thief doesn't look like a zombie or act like one. (There isn't any decay to his skin and he steals guns not brains.) So is he taking your guns to study so he can combat the living dead and possibly mass produce the Ray Gun, Thunder Gun, Winters Howl, or any PaP'd gun? As he usually shows up when activating the Defconn switches which lead to the PaP'd room. Also from what I can tell of the Illumanati they like technology and like to think they do things to help mankind in general but have a shady way of doing things. Meaning he may take your guns and screw you over, but it could help people worldwide. Let me know what you guys think.
  7. SwarmxofxHate

    The True identity of the Thief!

    Well Five has to take place in 63 before the JFK assassination and after the Cuban Missile Crisis. Because JFK is still alive and the talk about the Missile Crisis in the opening video. Apparently Kino der Toten takes place in 1950. (On the comic before Kino the teleporter dates go 1941 1943 1950.) So the dates add up to as if it is Richtofen he would be 13 years older. And yes I do mean the Richtofen you play as. This is just a Theory because there is really no solid answer as to who the Pentagon Thief is. the exact date kino is on is 1965-1969 as the Berliner Fernsehturm(the tower you can see from the alleyway) was constructed between 1965-1969 and in the map it is clearly under construction sorry but that might rule out richtofen but this time travle is confusing shit Well good point. I didn't think of that man. lol [brains] But honestly I'm not so sure that the Pentagon teleporters are capable of time travel. I mention why in an above post.
  8. SwarmxofxHate

    The True identity of the Thief!

    This is correct. [brains] to you man. This actually means it may be Richtofen: 1. Part of group 935 2. Part of Illuminati 3. In Kino der Toten you see a film that has a scientist wearing a lab coat and it has E A R in the lower corner. Edward A. Richtofen? 4. Picture of Richtofen in Pentagon. Why is there a picture of a crazy Nazi/Illuminati in the Pentagon? I'm still not sure who it is for sure, but the more I learn the more Richtofen seems most likely. you mean richtofen that you play as? i supose five could be after the events of the other maps witch i havent considered befor a bit far feched but still a theory with proof. Well Five has to take place in 63 before the JFK assassination and after the Cuban Missile Crisis. Because JFK is still alive and the talk about the Missile Crisis in the opening video. Apparently Kino der Toten takes place in 1950. (On the comic before Kino the teleporter dates go 1941 1943 1950.) So the dates add up to as if it is Richtofen he would be 13 years older. And yes I do mean the Richtofen you play as. This is just a Theory because there is really no solid answer as to who the Pentagon Thief is.
  9. SwarmxofxHate

    The True identity of the Thief!

    This is correct. [brains] to you man. This actually means it may be Richtofen: 1. Part of group 935 2. Part of Illuminati 3. In Kino der Toten you see a film that has a scientist wearing a lab coat and it has E A R in the lower corner. Edward A. Richtofen? 4. Picture of Richtofen in Pentagon. Why is there a picture of a crazy Nazi/Illuminati in the Pentagon? I'm still not sure who it is for sure, but the more I learn the more Richtofen seems most likely.
  10. SwarmxofxHate

    The True identity of the Thief!

    Man, don't treat me like a child I read this entire tread. Different people keep giving you different views as to why your theory is flawed. And all you do is rehash the same things you've been saying since the thread was started. Basically you haven't proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that it is Clarke and that burden indeed falls to you. If you had anything other than circumstantial evidence you would have a firmer argument. Also you didn't have anything to say about my Teleporter Theories. You just dismissed what I had to say based on Clarke still has part of his brain, but what about the fact that he died before coming into contact with a zombie. (In your Theory.) And in the story of CoD Zombies you send a living person through a halfway working teleporter, you get a zombie, or a zombie bites a living person, you get a zombie. Zombies don't eat necrotic flesh because a dead person can't be turned into a zombie. This is also sited in The Zombie Survival Guide, page 5. Please post a argument that doesn't refer back to what you've already said, because at this point I've given you two intelligent reasons why your theory doesn't work. Now, the way this works is if you give me a good argument why my theories don't make sense and we try and abroach the TRUTH. Your dismissing what I'm saying because you want to believe your theory is TRUE which begs the question: Why did you post this THEORY if you didn't want other peoples opinion?
  11. SwarmxofxHate

    The True identity of the Thief!

    Hellsing is also right on this. I have seen every George A. Romero film and a quote from them would be "If you kill the brain you kill the ghoul." George's zombies are also created from a meteor. Coincidence? Probably not, but Re-animation needs at least a good chunk of brain still connected to the stem to give the nerves in the body signals to feed. This can also be sited from Max Brook's Zombie Survival Guide. Meaning you can cut a zombies head off and the head will still be alive while the body dies, but you scramble the brain with a bullet and it all dies. As Hellsing stated its still reacting to the last command it recieved.
  12. SwarmxofxHate

    The True identity of the Thief!

    The theory is well thought out. This thread has also made me lol a good 10 times. Time travel is a big part of zombies but the one thing no one mention is the fact that the teleporters in Five are totally different from all the others: 1. They don't randomly teleport you to an area off map like Kinos i.e. Samanthas Room, Crazy Samanthas room, Meeting Room, etc. 2. They don't have a lightning flash, they have numbers all around them. 3. They don't require a cooldown time. 4. You don't have to intiate a link to another pad. 5. Kinos teleporter kills zombies and in five they can use them. In conclusion, the teleporters in five may not even be powered by element 115 as there is no evidece of it. So if it is a completely different technology then the teleporters in Five may not be capable of time travel as there is no evidence of it. Also there are many different things around Five i.e. Thundergun and Ray gun. The Americans didn't make those, so they probably stole the teleporters from the Russias or Germans also. The Numbers were Russian but Steiner , a German scientist, help with the creation. So maybe the Thief is Russian or German, this would explain why and how he is breaking into the Pentagon. Hes a commie/nazi with a revenge issue. With that being said, my chronological order is a little screwy, because JFK is assassinated in 63 and Mason and Hudson barely figure out what is going on with the numbers in 68. So how can America steal tech that they don't even understand? With all that said It's quite possible that five is more of a nod to gamers by letting us play as these prominent political figures killing zombies at the Pentagon, and the Thief is a nod to Zork. But if I'm wrong and it is canon then I don't think Clarke is the thief because the teleporters in Five may not be capable of time travel (which is the only way to explain the aging), and in my opinion he physically (other than the markings) looks nothing like Clarke. It would make more sense if he was a different scientist working on the same project as Clarke, which would explain the equation markings. I'm not saying I'm 100% right, this is just my theory on the subject. Sorry for such a big post. I articulated my thoughts as best I could.

Call of Duty Zombies Code of Conduct

The Code of Conduct (CoC for short) for using the website can be found here

Our Privacy / Cookie Policy

Call of Duty Zombies privacy policy / cookie information can be found here

Our Terms of Use

The terms of use can be found here

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, Code of Conduct, We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. .