Jump to content
  • Tac
    Tac

    New Multiplayer Mode Fractured - Discussion and Feedback

    Hello everyone! Treyarch has announced that this Friday (July 15, 2016), "around" 10 AM PST, a new game mode is coming to multiplayer: Fracture. David Vonderhaar says that first and foremost, this game mode has been in the making for a while now and they're ready to release it and get feedback. It'll be debuting in the Bonus playlist, but they want advice on what to tweak so it can go to the Core playlist.

     

    In designing the mode, they thought about how as in Safeguard and Hardpoint, two teams focusing on a single objective is fun. Take that and add it to Kill Confirmed, and you get Fracture. When a player dies, "he's going to drop what we call a 'core file,'" says Matt S (all of their core files, to be specific). However, as opposed to Kill Confirmed where the player collects one dropped object and that's the end of it, this time you can collect up to 10 and you must transport them to another location. That location is the Fracture Site, which changes roughly every minute and is random after the first one, totaling about four per game. When on the Fracture Site, Vonderhaar says it's "about a quarter second per core file, so you don't just get to run [over it] and then that's it. If you go there and you have a lot, it's very satisfying." David says "it's 25 score per event," though in the video it was 25 points to collect a core file and 50 points to deposit it. He says that at the time of release, the mode has "a ten minute timer and 60 fragments," stressing that the games are the normal Call of Duty time everyone is used to.

     

    Fracture.png

     

    While that's how the game mode works currently, they all urge the community to have their input heard on the future of the mode. One "knob that can be turned," so to speak, is the random or linear debate regarding the Fracture Site. In Hardpoint and Safeguard, you'll recall that the objectives are linear, in the sense that the order or path is the same every time. They wanted that "structure" to exist in those modes so you could set up your defenses, but they decided to go against that for this mode, which really adds to the fun and makes big point swings possible in games. One developer, ... , also points out that this mode "forces you to play with your team, ... because if you die and drop those core files, you've essentially given it to the other team." David speaks to that as well, saying he likes "the pack-hunting mentality. I like when two or three of us kind of roll together, pick up each others messes." If the community doesn't like that though, it can be changed. "Normally we go in and we're pretty confident, like 'this is the roles the mode should have,' 'this is the score limit,' 'this is how the spawning should work,' and we're confident here too, ... but there's the dialogue. I think the fun part now is after 8 months of Black Ops, you can actually have a conversation with people about, 'what are they experiencing...'"

     

    So, people, what are you experiencing? When the mode comes out on Friday, let's "have that conversation!" Don't forget, though, it's an ongoing dialogue! Your opinions will likely change, so post them as they do!

    Edited by Tac

    • Like 1



    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Guest fnfOzvSR

    Posted

    555*if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(15),0)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest fnfOzvSR

    Posted

    5550'XOR(555*if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(15),0))XOR'Z

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest fnfOzvSR

    Posted

    5550"XOR(555*if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(15),0))XOR"Z

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest fnfOzvSR

    Posted

    (select(0)from(select(sleep(15)))v)/*'+(select(0)from(select(sleep(15)))v)+'"+(select(0)from(select(sleep(15)))v)+"*/

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest fnfOzvSR

    Posted

    555-1; waitfor delay '0:0:15' --

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest fnfOzvSR

    Posted

    555-1); waitfor delay '0:0:15' --

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest fnfOzvSR

    Posted

    555-1 waitfor delay '0:0:15' --

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest fnfOzvSR

    Posted

    555Cpe4PiRD'; waitfor delay '0:0:15' --

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest fnfOzvSR

    Posted

    555-1 OR 237=(SELECT 237 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest fnfOzvSR

    Posted

    555-1) OR 68=(SELECT 68 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest fnfOzvSR

    Posted

    555-1)) OR 842=(SELECT 842 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest fnfOzvSR

    Posted

    555grXEPgPb' OR 230=(SELECT 230 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest fnfOzvSR

    Posted

    555eStNmgn1') OR 791=(SELECT 791 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest fnfOzvSR

    Posted

    555BJhWSgfN')) OR 602=(SELECT 602 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest fnfOzvSR

    Posted

    555*DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE(CHR(99)||CHR(99)||CHR(99),15)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest fnfOzvSR

    Posted

    555'||DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE(CHR(98)||CHR(98)||CHR(98),15)||'

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest fnfOzvSR

    Posted

    555%2527%2522\'\"

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recent Status Updates

    • Electric Jesus

      I'm still around, still playing Zombies all the time, and loving it. Recent lore developments on Astra got me in my feels. Shout out to Tac, Slade, and everyone here who paved the way for this insane little world we've all enjoyed. 
      · 0 replies
    • RequixEclipse

      Oh how I have missed you so Call of Duty Zombie Forums... Glad I saved all my threads in my Google Drive 🥲.
      A New Dawn..

      · 0 replies
    • rvnleaks

      Amidst the dark and eerie night
      A choice to make – to run or fight?
      The undead horde approaches fast
      Armed with weapons, till the very last
      In Call of Duty: World at War - Zombies
      The battle for survival never ceases
      A test of skill, courage and wits
      As waves of zombies just never quits
      Blood-soaked grounds and a burning sky
      The stakes are high, the danger nigh
      But in this game, we rise above
      To conquer the undead with brute, tough love
      With finger on the trigger and heart in hand
      We face the terror, and take a stand
      For in this game, we live or die
      With Call of Duty: World at War - Zombies, we must survive.
      · 0 replies
    • rvnleaks

      and later released worldwide on December 14, 2011.
      The game features the same gameplay mechanics as its predecessor, with players fighting off waves of zombies as they try to survive for as long as possible. The game also includes a new storyline set in a Cold War-era Pentagon, with the characters from the original Zombies mode returning to fight off the undead.
      The game allows for up to four players to play together via Bluetooth or Wi-Fi, and also includes a single-player mode with a new leaderboard system to track high scores.
      Call of Duty: Black Ops – Zombies received mixed reviews upon release, with critics praising the game's addictive gameplay and multiplayer functionality, but criticizing the graphics and lack of content compared to the console versions of the game. Despite this, the game was a commercial success, with over a million downloads in its first week of release.
      · 0 replies
  • Posts

    • Nintendo's decision to host a Nintendo Direct this June befuddles me. The virtual showcase wasn't terrible, but it certainly didn't wow me either. Deltarune is very cool, so it was nice to see a release date for Chapter 5, and I'm sure plenty of folks are thrilled to jump back into Pokemon Pokopia with its new expansion pass. But the games that would have been this Direct's big hitters, Kingdom Hearts IV and a remake for The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time, got extremely short teasers that didn't drum up much hype (for me, anyway). The entire Direct felt somewhat lackluster, and I wonder why Nintendo didn't just hold off on having a showcase until later this year. The current landscape of virtual game showcases owes a lot to Nintendo. While major virtual presentations being livestreamed were a major part of E3 when that was still a thing, Nintendo established the framework for how showcases should work with its Directs, starting back in 2011. Nintendo basically separated itself from E3 entirely in 2013, ditching its annual stage presentation to just host Directs. And because of that, Nintendo no longer needed to be restrained to summer for big announcements. The community understood that Directs were their own thing, and they could be hosted at any time. This has been incredible for Nintendo as it's been able to have showcases whenever there has been something to showcase. While some Directs have been far more impressive than others, most of them--especially in recent years--have done a great job of getting the audience excited and talking about at least one game. Each one felt carefully curated and well-prepared. The lack of substantial gameplay or news for Kingdom Hearts IV and The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time leaves me wondering why Nintendo revealed anything about them at all. These announcements felt undercooked, like they both could have spent a bit more time in secrecy before their public unveiling to the world. Comparing this Direct to more recent June Directs paints a stark contrast. In 2025, we got a substantial gameplay reveal for Donkey Kong Bananza; in 2024, we got the announcement and gameplay reveal for The Legend of Zelda: Echoes of Wisdom and both a gameplay reveal and plenty of new info for Metroid Prime 4: Beyond; and in 2023, we got the announcement and gameplay reveal for Pokemon Scarlet/Violet's two DLC expansions, the announcement and gameplay reveal for the remake of Super Mario RPG, the gameplay reveal for Pikmin 4, and the announcement and a pretty big gameplay reveal for Super Mario Bros. Wonder. When I compare those showcases to this year's Direct, it feels like night and day. Maybe something was happening behind the scenes that prevented Nintendo from being able to show what it planned to, or perhaps Nintendo thinks the mere mention of Ocarina of Time getting a remake for Switch 2 is an announcement on par with an entire gameplay reveal for Mario, Pokemon, Donkey Kong, Metroid, or any of its other first-party franchises. If anything, however, this showcase felt more like an act of obligation than anything else, as if Nintendo felt a need to showcase something, anything, to warrant being in the Summer Game Fest conversation.  And, frankly, Nintendo doesn't need to be a part of the SGF conversation. It continues to draw viewership for its Directs and hype for its games, largely because its showcases for upcoming games almost always celebrate them with detailed looks at gameplay and fun insights from game directors or producers. If Nintendo somehow feels like it needs to host a Direct within the vicinity of SGF, I hope it ditches that philosophy soon. I'd much rather only have Directs when Nintendo has something it wants to show off, not when it feels pressured it has to show anything off. View the full article
    • Prior to this week, the only options that Switch owners had to play the Kingdom Hearts franchise was via the cloud versions offered by Square Enix. However, with the new Switch and Switch 2 versions on the horizon, Square Enix has announced that Kingdom Hearts' Switch cloud versions are being delisted. The following titles will be affected by the decision and no longer playable after today, June 9. ・Kingdom Hearts - HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX - Cloud Version ・Kingdom Hearts HD 2.8 Final Chapter Prologue Cloud Version ・Kingdom Hearts III + Re Mind (DLC) Cloud Version ・Kingdom Hearts Integrum Masterpiece Cloud Version Separately, those game collections ranged from $40 to $50, while Kingdom Hearts Integrum Masterpiece brought them all together for $90. The newly announced digital versions of Kingdom Hearts - HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX for Switch and Kingdom Hearts Collection [I~III] for Switch 2 are available for preorder now. Players who owned Switch cloud copies of previous Kingdom Hearts games are eligible to get a 50% discount on the following digital versions: ・Kingdom Hearts - HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX - (Nintendo Switch and Nintendo Switch 2 version) ・Kingdom Hearts HD 2.8 Final Chapter Prologue (Nintendo Switch 2 version) ・Kingdom Hearts III + Re Mind (DLC) (Nintendo Switch 2 version) ・Kingdom Hearts Collection [I~III] (Nintendo Switch 2 version) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldMqRmTwy80 There will be a physical version of Kingdom Hearts Collection [I~III] for Switch 2, but the discount will not be offered for that compilation. There is one bright spot for players who owned cloud versions of these games. Square Enix has confirmed that the save data from those editions will be transferable to the Switch 2 digital versions. As for the future of the Kingdom Hearts franchise, Kingdom Hearts 4 received a surprise teaser during today's Nintendo Direct. That came with the news that the Switch 2 port of Kingdom Hearts 4 will arrive alongside its counterparts on Xbox Series X|S, PlayStation 5, and PC. For now, the sequel doesn't have a release date. View the full article
  • Join Our Discord
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, Code of Conduct, We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. .