Jump to content

NaBrZHunter

Administrators
  • Posts

    1,777
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    50

Everything posted by NaBrZHunter

  1. the staves though...smh. One of the biggest reasons I hate getting into an online match on Origins. People start arguing about staves, race to the shovels, and split up, all trying to find their own pieces instead of working together. Randomization resolves that, unless you have a bunch of people who are happy using any staff.
  2. Yeah but I still feel like it could be a bit more random as in you have an equal chance at every weapon. I would advocate reducing the odds for wonder weapons. They aren't necessary, they're abused by n00bs and kill hogs, and it sweetens the moment when you finally do get ahold of one.
  3. I leave the game if I get the MTAR, no question. I have grown to hate it that much that I cannot obtain it from the box when its one of my first few weapons without leaving. I've only left the game once because of bad box weapons and that was on Nuketown (surprise suprise), i had 4k to spend on the box, RPG, War Machine, SMR and an Executioner, i was mad, i tried to make up more points, hit box again, got FAL, then again, a teddy - i then left. New Giant meme...the great evil is the mystery box. Lol
  4. I would say it was on par with Famas. Actually...may be on par with Commando. Famas is pretty poor. And Commando had high recoil, low clip count, and medium damage. I used to like the Commando but didn't after realizing the Galil was way better, I knew the Commando was only worth it if getting it at the beginning of a match. The Type 25 was honestly just Famas 2.0, and thus garbage. I can respect that-to each his own. You probably know better, anyway. I'm just now getting back into BO2, and only out of obligation. You wouldn't be inclined to do the Richtofen easter eggs with Pinnaz and I this weekend, would you? If I was on Xbox I would most certainly be inclined to. Or if I even had a PS3 that was still able to connect online. Ah! An impassible barrier, fo true.
  5. Did you ever have a chance to check out that episode? I think I've asked you a couple times, but it's pretty mind-blowing. lol I would think so...and hope so. @Rissole25 D-: Not an Exo Zombies comparison... :-P How could you. LOL!
  6. I would say it was on par with Famas. Actually...may be on par with Commando. Famas is pretty poor. And Commando had high recoil, low clip count, and medium damage. I used to like the Commando but didn't after realizing the Galil was way better, I knew the Commando was only worth it if getting it at the beginning of a match. The Type 25 was honestly just Famas 2.0, and thus garbage. I can respect that-to each his own. You probably know better, anyway. I'm just now getting back into BO2, and only out of obligation. You wouldn't be inclined to do the Richtofen easter eggs with Pinnaz and I this weekend, would you?
  7. Actually, I think his choice of words is interesting. "Unseen" is kinda...specific and perspective-oriented. Once again, sounds like The Shadow.
  8. I would say it was on par with Famas. Actually...may be on par with Commando. Famas is pretty poor. And Commando had high recoil, low clip count, and medium damage.
  9. @TimelordAlex I'm not an expert on BO2 weapons, but there was the AN-94 and the Type 25, right?
  10. I can feel it taking over: not even my mind is safe. I'M GOING TO LOSE MY MIND OVER THIS HYPE!!! Dafuq did I just WATCH???

  11. "Only the cursed survive" does not indicate that they are marked. If I recall, that comes from the misconception relating the "curse" to the Mark of the Beast. What most people don't seem to realize is that 666, AKA, the number of man (six, threescore and six) is a actually a number used in relation to economics. See below. Revelation 13, verse... "16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: 17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. 18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six." It is the "number of man," and is a number permitting politically correct economic transactions. People associating it with witchcraft and magic and the undead...need a lesson in Christian end times prophesy. It might, however, tie into Black Ops 3 Campaign. The mark of the Beast has long been associated with technological advancement and human cyber-integration. No, um if you didn't know "Only the Cursed Survive." Relates to Shadows of Evil. That card, with the symbol on it. That symbol is on the characters hands in Shadows of Evil. Although Only the Cursed Survive can relate to all characters really. The lucky ones die and become zombies but the cursed survive. Thats why we never really have any characters in zombies who are good people and they always have done something bad or have had a shady history. Thats kinda why I think the unmarked man, as a name, could relate to zombies since the O3 need a 4th and have a truly good character leading them would be interesting. But thats just conjecture idk if they are even coming back. Oh! I'd forgotten about that. True, they do have a mark. Still don't think it'll be the Unmarked Man, though. And yes, I recall it does. I just went on a rant because people are really kinda silly about 666-treating it like an evil and powerful unlucky 13 or something. Hm. I can't say the zombies are lucky. They're miserable, and just want to be dead. Which inevitably comes, but in the meantime, they are in a virtual hell. I wouldn't say that Dempsey is shady or "bad," though. Just a soldier. His backstory involves him managing to escape POW status using a bobby pin and a metal of honor. Same with Misty and Marleton. I'm thinking the "only the cursed survive" is, like you said, but exclusively for SoE and maybe Alcatraz.
  12. "Only the cursed survive" does not indicate that they are marked. If I recall, that comes from the misconception relating the "curse" to the Mark of the Beast. What most people don't seem to realize is that 666, AKA, the number of man (six, threescore and six) is a actually a number used in relation to economics. See below. Revelation 13, verse... "16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: 17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. 18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six." It is the "number of man," and is a number permitting politically correct economic transactions. People associating it with witchcraft and magic and the undead...need a lesson in Christian end times prophesy. It might, however, tie into Black Ops 3 Campaign. The mark of the Beast has long been associated with technological advancement and human cyber-integration.
  13. Virtually confirmed: the unmarked man is not related to Black Ops 3 Zombies or the 'only the cursed survive' death card promo. This may be obvious, or already concluded, but I just wanted to provide that in the form of a concrete post. He appears to be a 'freethinker,' 'conspiracy theorist,' and/or 'whistleblower.' I'm thinking we've already seen his face. The tone and attitude is very familiar. Apologies for the format. I'm on mobile and I can't access the gallery to add images to the post. From Black Ops 3 "Ember" trailer.
  14. We're looking to start Richtofen's side of the BO2 EEs this weekend - would you be down?
  15. Man, the channel has an 'informative/archive' vibe. I think this video honored that. Good work! I actually would like to see more like this.
  16. yeah, no...I'm thinking that's way out in left field. He was a test subject.
  17. I've been listening to a bunch of the episodes. They are always introduced with "Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men? The Shadow knows! Buahahahaha."
  18. Thats exactly how I have always seen them. It doesn't make sense for them to have story significance linking to Origins really, thats just how people who don't have an as clear view on the time loop view it. E.g. they think Maxis goes back in time to fix everything. Y'know, when I first heard the theory that he reversed time, I was very opposed. Since then, I have somewhat changed my mind. I think you have changed my mind again. What I really wanna know is, what, like Weasel killing his fellows in MotD, is the catalyst for the original story?
  19. @PINNAZ Again, great find! Check out that cover art for The Shadow! This is a freaking gold mine, I'm certain. Love it.
  20. No, I think there's just some confusion in phrasing...at least for me, there was. I am aware it is all the same time loop. Whether Origins is the beginning of it, the end of it, or Buried is the end of it is up in the air, IMO. But you make good points.
  21. Yeah I think me and Kill_All_Monkeys both said yes. Did you not see the messages? Ah! Okay, I didn't realize yours was affirmative. Thanks, good deal! I'll be getting back with y'all shortly.
  22. @Nightmare Voyager Ah! I see...hm...well, actually the thing about Peter...that is one I was mulling over the other day. BTW, did you decide whether you would mind me running my ideas past y'all? 'Cause I wanted to talk about Peter in one of the videos...I think we may be in for something interesting...
  23. Naw, it's not proof. I'm just trying to think objectively. All the evidence would point *more* towards him being dead than to him being alive and escaped. Perhaps Richtofen, though still considering him 'broken', has another experimental use for him and I am wrong. Its just that historical precedent would imply that he is dead. Well I think they do try to make him sound dead. Even if he is they hinted at it so its okay. But if he wasn't and they had managed to hide something like that I would be really excited. If they had misdirected everyone it would really shake things up and make people question radios. Don't get me wrong, I agree. They did kinda leave it open-ended. I'm just thinking the odds are against him. I wouldn't say that confirmation of his death would be a misdirection, but just a reminder that radios are debatable as well.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, Code of Conduct, We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. .