xXExpertCoahXx

How is quick scoping not fair? If anything hard scoping isn't fair. Atleast when you quick scope theirs more of a chance of missing than it is looking through your scope for an hour.

Well if your a team player and want to get high rounds its just automatic. Doesn't matter when it comes to survival.

My highest revive count has been 155 revives. In one game. At round 35...Team sucked.

That is true. I think headshots are one shot kills for anything.

Speed Cola and Double Tap will fix both of those problems. Double Tap slows down cocking the bolt-action and Speed Cola swaps clips faster. Both perks are very useful when running sniper and shotty.

The Vrill is actually one of the best guns on COTD if used properly. When upgraded and fired upon a teammate the teammate you shot has 30 second insta-kill and invincibility. Amazing when trapped in tight corners. Depends on if the person your playing with knows what the hell he's doing.

An underwater base james bond style would work. It could have the pack-a-punch machine in a totally flooded room where you have to go round the map activating pumps to get inside I've never played James Bond so I wouldn't understand your reference. How exactly does that apply to underwater gun firing? And besides that what would the pumps accomplish by activating them? Besides allowing you access to a flooded room. Unless they were those types of pumps that extract water instead of pumping water inside the already flooded room. Nice idea by the way I'm not doubting your skill for coming up with amazing map ideas 8-)

If the PPsH comes back I will be the worlds most happiest zombie fan.

And besides that it was Rictofen and Maxis who started the DG weapon series. Not the whole entire group 935.

Absolutely crap. Hopefully there would be a bit more balance or parity in the future for shot guns and snipers. Seriously? Have you guys even used the Stakeout? Or the upgraded Olympia? The Hades is pretty amazing even though its first stage sucks. And besides that both the L9A61 and the Dragnov are amazingly good snipers. Actually try using the guns the way they are meant to be used before giving such a biased statement.

I wouldn't want a whole new story line because Treyarch left us with such a huge cliffhanger on the story line we have now. I think if they gave us new characters without any of the old characters a lot of the fans would be angry.

I do the easter eggs in maps solely for the story. I don't care if I get a reward or not. I like learning things about this wonderful universe that Treyarch has allowed their fans to journey through.

Humans as a whole are afraid of change. That's just a fact, not a critisism. But I wish that people who didn't like what may or may not happen with a game mode that hasn't even been announced yet would keep their text boxes empty. No offense. Dang. That was awesome! [brains]

Lol that would actually be hilarious if they added that. Nice ones.

Well maybe Group 935 moved up in the future and decided that improving the human condition is by destroying all traces of 115 and survivors coming into contact with it. Hence the ORC related story line.

Truthfully the L96A1 was a pretty good one shotter between rounds 1-12. Then PaP was good between rounds 12-20. I didn't have problems with the Dragnov either although it took a few more shots to down a zombie.

Bottom line is that the 8 player multiplayer version of zombies is going to be not part of the original story. Story mode for zombies is going to be traditional 4 player coop. In that 4 player coop I'm sure we will have maps going back to the WaW days.

Guns wouldn't be able to operate properly underwater.

Your right. They did say they would be pushing the boundaries. And they are by integrating 8 player mode and multiplayer engine. As far as story line goes, we won't know anything concrete until closer to the release date. And as far as the poster goes for Ascension, most of us knew that Rictofen was going to be in Ascension. There was only a select few people that questioned it.

That is true. I'm just saying we know that the time line of zombies is going to start during the 70s. Right after WaW and possibly go through the 80s which is time time line of BOs. So maybe we will have a few maps to fill in the gaps before we reach Kino?

This thought just made me think about a crazy idea. What if there are two story modes for zombies. One follow the original four characters (with exception of Samantha instead of Rictofen) and the other story mode follows a group of four new characters sent to destroy the original group so that the world doesn't plunge into chaos. It would be one of those, 'which one is the good guys?', type of thing. Are heroes could be trying to save the world or perhaps they have their own alternative motives. Perhaps these four new characters are the true heroes of the apocalypse. Who knows? Anyways leave feedback and your own thoughts.

Already have a nuke in zombies. Just not as shiny as the nuke or MOAB in the MW series.

I think people misinterpret the reason for this topic. The idea was for people to share ideas about different perks and if they would/should integrate a perk 2.0 system. It wasn't necessarily just my ideas =/ I still appreciate all the feedback though I do understand now why most of you say these are all overpowered. Cause they are. I came up with the ideas while thinking of unlimited spawning of zombies and/or a hardcore mode. Probably should have stated that in the first post, but it didn't cross my mind. Sorry for the confusion.

Thanks. I mean if it isn't Samantha then obviously it's a completely different character altogether. They wouldn't bring back Sarah Michelle Gellar and I'm pretty sure that Maxis' love interest, Sophia, is dead. And if she wasn't she wouldn't look like a teenager.

All of this was based on the fact that the game of zombies would be much harder. And think about it...You have to buy the perk then upgrade.