Jump to content

PatrolinMexican

Member
  • Posts

    17
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by PatrolinMexican

  1. I don't know if anyone has mentioned this but, is it possible that Nuketown and Die Rise are occurring at the same instance (occurring before Green Run) and that's why we don't see Marlton in the trailer for Die Rise?

    Comment with your thoughts.

    Theory from: iTz princdj3 and PatrolinMexican

    - Sanchez

  2. Many of you are confusing and infusing multiple ideas. My point was to give notice to those who have posted misleading titles, reason for calling them trolls, was because it fits best. The only other name I could find suitable is false leading poster, which is entirely too long. Not saying that I'm just calling people names, I just mean I hope you can reconsider your titles to include appropriate words such as Theory, Proof, etc. I mean no harm or need to insult anyone, I just hoped for a cleaner structure. Because as I've noticed and am pretty sure a good portion of the community is tired of reading posts saying they have found the next step when it's just a theory. That's all this thread was about; misleading titles. Fin!

    - Sanchez

  3. Power Room Theory

    Our first theory is in the power room, there are four computers. A max of four players are allowed, so we believe maybe you need to use these computers to open something. Possibly the Avogadro's spawn point or the trains. What do you think?

    Bridge Theory

    Our second theory, we also believe that on the bridge when you are going towards the bus depot. That you need to jet gun on top of this bridge piece. To explain this piece if you are coming from the town, it will be on your right, there are two beams with a metal sheet lying on top of them, forming a ledge. Maybe another piece is on the roof or maybe a NAV card lying on the bridge beams.

    From(GTs'): iTz princdj3, PatrolinMexican, and MikaelMacho671

    - Sanchez

  4. I know and understand that the crosshairs turn blue once hovered over another player with the Krauss, but I recall that one time where the Avogadro is released from (the hole) I had saw blue crosshairs. I'm not sure if I had colorblind assist on. I will retry this later and if anything comes up I will edit my post.

    - Sanchez

  5. Not much new info, but yes that's how I see it. The two "teams" consisting of Marlton & Misty and Russman & Samuel. However, determining which one is good or evil is hard. Although Samuel can hear Richtofen, and he convinces the other three to do Richtofen's plan, doesn't mean he is necessarily evil. You also have to divulge back to the past, and determine which, either Richtofen or Maxis is evil. I know you are probably reading this saying "You idiot Richtofen is evil", but let me finish. Maxis has never had his way, and if you know about the storyline, Maxis was the one who intended to reanimate dead bodies, for what purpose who knows? And, yes Richtofen may control the zombies and yes they're after us, but when Samantha controlled them they were also after us. My point being the game never distinguishes either side as good or bad. It's just up to us to decide.

    - Sanchez

  6. Yes, you mention a good idea. However, that calls for restructuring the ranking system, which I'm pretty sure Admins' would not like to do. We can perhaps create a ranking system with titles and everything figured out for them and then propose it which just makes them enact it, rather than brainstorming for it and etc. (although that doesn't take long either)

    - Sanchez

  7. Actually I use vbulletin.

    We need to take in the nature of this website and the average age of the members it attracts. I am sure there are members registered here who are under 10. Everyone gets excited when they think they have found something that may be the next step, and are only trying to help. People get cornered when they get put on the spot to show proof. Not every knows how to make a YouTube video. Perhaps you or someone here will do a tutorial on how to do it. One for each system(ps3, xbox, wii, and pc) would be nice!

    There are others who are bs'ers, and have only posted just to post. The posts are what they are. It is your choice on whether you view it or not. Look at the username before you view the post you are unsure about. Its less clicks to hit the back button instead of calling someone out on their post. Oh wait......thats not fun unless you are trying to shame someone.

    It only takes a few bad apples to ruin the whole crop. We all need to work together or the hate mongers will drive members away.

    Yes, that's understood. However, when people think they have found the next step, in their title it should read "Possible next step" not "Discovered the Next Step" the two titles mean different things. And no calling someone out doesn't mean we are trying to shame someone we just want to make it clear that they know proof is required. Also, putting a video isn't necessary Call of Duty: Elite is an alternative method. Putting the video in their vault will let others view it.

    - Sanchez

  8. Should I register a new username to reply or go with the one I have? I wont hide my name, I will use the one I registered with.

    Lets talk about discussion forums. I have owned discussion forums since 2001. The best thing for any discussion forums is posts. Posts creates activity on forums, and activity brings in new members. Being a website owner, you want as much activity and as many members as you can get. This is where the advertising dollars to pay for a website come from. I own several websites and know exactly how much it costs every month to run it.

    The "next step" from the person you called a "troll" in your post, could be the answer everyone is looking for in the next step in an Easter egg. Like it or not.....it's good for this website!

    Replies that say "Use the search feature" is one of my biggest pet peaves. In all of my years of being an owner, I have never told anyone to use the search feature, and all of my moderators have been instructed to never say it. The "use the search feature" reply throws up a red flag and the member that posted the original post will go into defensive mode. Besides....someone else may have came along after the original post and may have another answer.

    Discussion forums get members of all ages, races, and backgrounds. Everyone needs to work together as a community. When someone posts something, they should not get a response like "there is no fucking pyramid". Seriously.....would you like to be treated that way. Treat others the way you would like to be treated!

    This website is not the only fish in the sea. There are lots of other websites out there that would like your members!

    You have some truth in your posts, but first off you're background information concerning hosting websites was unnecessary, because anyone can open a phpBB forum. (not to sound mean, after all I'm a fellow web page host/programmer)

    Yes you mention that these threads spark ideas and make people continue the conversation, and this helps in finding the solution. However, allow to perform a rebuttal, by me saying "troll" I don't mean everyone that, posts a thread saying next step is a "troll" nor am I specifically aiming this at anyone. I've just noticed that when a thread saying "Next Step" rather than "Possible Next Step Theory" makes people assume the route has been found. We then reply with put up a video or a screenshot to prove yourself. What I am saying is rather than continue to post comments like "TROLL" or "He a ******* *** * * * * * *" that is unnecessary. However, I do agree with you saying this a community effort but, by saying that, means that we can't insult each other until nothing is left, we simply call the person out on their "findings" and move on. There are after all a bunch of other threads asking for theories and debunking them.

    You also mentioned that the people that say "Found Next Step" in their thread title might be the person that has found the next step. That is true, but if that's the case, when the post the thread, and we request video or picture proof, it should be provided. People who are creditworthy will provide photos and videos, it's the people that say "I found the next step", but for some reason they can't upload a video, when there is a theater mode to render clips for viewing, that I'm talking about.

    Lastly, I do understand that this website is one of many, but I personally have been observing the other websites, and I'm more that sufficiently impressed with this one. That is why I chose to make this post, so I can help contribute to make this site stay at #1.

    - Sanchez

  9. Definitely needed to be said. It's not those people's fault. It's the person creating the thread that makes the title of the topic "next step found" when in all actuality they have no idea if it is. 99% of those threads are just theories

    You are right. I'm glad to see that someone agrees with me. Let's just be sure to also remind the user who posts the supposedly "next step" that their post is a theory, therefore they should include that within their title, and proof would be needed as well. Thanks for the info Nasdaq401.

    - Sanchez

  10. Just decided to put my 2 cents in, if you guys haven't noticed the troll rate has went up considering the fact we are trying to find out the "next" step, which may be there or not. The thing is when someone has posted a topic saying "FOUND THE NEXT STEP" all we need is one person to say, "put up proof and we will believe you" after that the only reason you should post otherwise is if you believe the person, and even in that moment a PM would be better. This will clean up the forums a little bit more. I apologize if you guys thought this post was unnecessary. Tell me what you think, thanks.

    - Sanchez

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, Code of Conduct, We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. .