Jump to content

TEHELFIE001

Member
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0

About TEHELFIE001

  • Rank
    Newbie
    Newbie
  1. High rounds are something that we all have either experienced or seen. For some of us we enjoy getting to high rounds, for others they simply enjoy watching others achieve high rounds. Why is this? Well from my perspective where I am a high round zombies player I see it as a way to test my abilities. The higher I get the more I am able to determine what my level of skill is on that map. It allows me to see where I can improve from previous mistakes, it also allows me to have a goal to aim for. When I play I have a personal best which I try to beat along with the top 10 for that map to try and get into. The higher I get the more I want to achieve even higher. Why do we enjoy watching high rounds? Well going from my perspective once again, I like seeing other people being able to achieve high rounds along with it giving me more goals to try and reach, I simply like watching high rounds because that's what I do I play high rounds. If you have an opinion on this topic please comment, I enjoy seeing over people's opinions.
  2. This is a topic that annoys me a bit. When I see some one get to a high round and then suicide because they got board I ask myself what does that accomplish? I can think of what is going through people's minds when they suicide. I've been playing this one game for 3 hrs or however long it has been and I'm bored so I will kill myself so I can do something else. Now this is what I like to call someone who is easy to bore, why even start playing if you get bored in the long run? I understand that not everyone likes going for high rounds but if your going to suicide in solo than why not just play co op. Another reason that people suicide can also be because they want to seem better than they are. How many times have you heard some one say. "I could have gotten a lot higher but I got bored and suicided." This puts people under the impression that you are better than what you are, they can't truly determine your skill if you suicide so they have to accept your word. Now some of the times where I don't mind when people suicide is when they are testing something in the game or they are purposely trying to get to a certain round as a celebration video on YouTube. Eg round 115 for your 115th video. This is just food for thought. I hope to hear your opinions on this topic.
  3. Yote was the first person I watched for zombies gameplay, I loved that he would always put his sons before everything else including YouTube. I remember the story he told of where he stayed at the hospital ate his sons side through out the entire time he was there. If his sons were at his house he would always make sure they were having fun with him. I respected him so much for that,. I'm glad i was able to talk to him for a brief period of time in one of King Jaqs live streams a couple months ago, we had a bit of a joke together and I asked about his sons. I'll miss you yote, you were truly the man I admired the most in zombies, I just wished I watched you more now. They say the good die young. Yote was truly good.
  4. I have to say that zombies is addictive but it is different for every one some like getting to high rounds on solo, others like Easter egg hunting and others just like everything about the game. I classify myself as a person who tries to excel in all that is zombies because I am addicted and I just can't get enough.
  5. I agree with this as the zombies move erratically in terms of early stages I find that as soon as you hit round 35+ along with your perk and gun line up there is little Stopping you from being able to achieve high rounds. It's just all up to the skill of the player.
  6. Greetings to all who read this, I was thinking about this idea just recently and is it really possible to be a consistent high round solo player? In order to get an answer we must first discuss what is considered high round, for the simplicity of this I'll say 70+ is high for solo. If it is possible to be a consistent player that means that we should in theory be able to hit the magic number of round 70 every game they play. If we look at the aspects of zombies we should be able to find an answer to this question. Every map has a different lay out along with a different play style that complements the map. Now for some to be consistent they have to hit round 70 every game of solo zombies they play. If we go off an average then yes there can be a consistency but if we really want to define consistency we have to say round 70 every game. The first step to being a consistent player is to know the map and the strategy you have to use on that map. If we know the map and strategy like the back of our hand then there should be no problem correct. Well this isn't the only thing we have to consider, we have to monitor the speed we move at, how long we play in a session, how the zombies work in their movement. Now all of the sudden it has become a lot harder to stay consistent, let me add more to this problem. Players have to be able to prepare for any situation and have to be able to make a full analysis of the situation in that very moment. This makes this whole idea of consistency a lot harder to achieve. To wrap things up, in theory it is possible to be consistent under what has been defined as consistent. In reality I believe it is impossible for a person to become truly consistent in their games. If we say as an average overall it definitely is possible to be a consistent player. Thanks are given to all who have read this. This is just food for though I would like to see what you opinions on the topic are.
  7. Greetings to all who read this, When we discuss high rounds in zombies we normally associate as solo being a harder play style to master yet is this the case? When we really look deep into the matter is solo easier or harder to master than co op zombies? I am a very strong solo zombies player where I try to achieve high rounds On every map. Yet when I go to play co op I tend to have a harder time adjusting, lets look at why this is. When we play solo we know what we are looking for in a player, we know our own weakness and strength on the game and we try to improve our performance. Now this is all good for playing solo but when playing co op it's different we have to account for our other teammates who are also playing with us. What are their strengths and weaknesses? What are they good at? We have to learn our team mates as well as we know ourselves in zombies. This isn't the only reason, obviously when we play solo there is a only 24 zombies per wave with multiple waves per round with the exception of world at war of course. Yet while we play co op we have to keep in mind that since we have more team mates we have more zombies spawning in per wave. This obviously makes a difference to the length of each round and the strategy on each map. Now this is nothing ground breaking when we talk about solo and co op but which is harder then. Many people who don't play on a high level believe that solo is harder since you are all alone and you have to combat all the zombies by yourself. Yet in reality it is co op that is harder as you have to depend on your team mates to be able to go through with a strategy, you have to rely that you and your team mate(s) are in sync as in you work well together. The reason why people perceive co op being easier is due to the fact that you have more players yet you have to be able to work as a unit and not as a group of individuals. This is what I have found when switching from playing high round solo gameplay to attempting high round co op gameplay. I still play solo the majority of the time but this is just food for thought for those who are interested. Please leave your opinions on the idea.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, Code of Conduct, We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. .